Law is fundamentally a practical architecture of norms, authoritative procedures, and remedies designed to balance competing social interests, articulate shared moral commitments where consensus exists, and provide definitive mechanisms for dispute adjudication.
Why a "Workable" Definition Matters
Jurisprudential inquiry offers an abundance of abstract abstractions: law as sovereign command (John Austin), law as an organic moral order (Natural Law), law as social facts and primary/secondary rules (H.L.A. Hart), or law as institutional policy (Ronald Dworkin). Each formulation illuminates a discrete conceptual facet, yet none alone suffices for daily judicial reasoning, statutory drafting, or legal pedagogy.
By a "workable" definition, we denote a formulation that is concise, analytically rigorous, and operational—capable of guiding scholarship, informing judicial discretion, and fostering civic comprehension. This inquiry synthesizes key jurisprudential schools to propose an actionable framework for jurists, scholars, and students alike.
Parliament may amend the Constitution, but it cannot dismantle its foundational architecture. An analytical inquiry into the judicial evolution of Bangladesh's Basic Structure Doctrine from Anwar Hossain Chowdhury to the Sixteenth Amendment.
The Ontological Structure: Layers, Not a Single Essence
Law is best understood not as a monolithic essence, but as a layered institutional phenomenon:
- Textual Layer: The formal corpus of constitutional charters, codified statutes, delegated regulations, and bilateral contracts.
- Operational Practice: The dynamic mechanics of law enforcement, civil litigation, adversarial advocacy, and judicial adjudication.
- Normative Expectations: The societal values and moral expectations that generate compliance and legitimacy.
These dimensions are reciprocal: black-letter text without enforcement remains inert; raw coercive enforcement without normative legitimacy degenerates into tyranny; and social norms lacking procedural clarity breed arbitrariness. A workable formulation must integrate both formal institutional requirements and behavioral realities.
Publish Your Research & Critical Analysis on MaroonPaper
Contribute in-depth essays on law, political philosophy, economics, and geopolitics to an intellectual readership.
Law as Social Engineering: The Functionalist Paradigm
Drawing on Roscoe Pound’s sociological jurisprudence, law operates as an instrument of social engineering—a sophisticated institutional toolkit designed to order human relations, balance friction, allocate burdens and benefits, and minimize social waste.
Under this functionalist lens:
A right without an enforceable remedy is an empty promise. Rooted in the maxim ubi jus ibi remedium, this jurisprudential study examines how Part III of the Bangladesh Constitution, Article 44, and the High Court Division's writ jurisdiction under Article 102 operationalize fundamental freedoms.
- Law is Purposive: Legal doctrines exist to serve rational social imperatives—such as commercial predictability, bodily safety, and distributive justice.
- Law is Responsive: Sound institutional design evolves in tandem with demographic, economic, and technological transformations.
- Law is Evaluative: Institutional success is judged by systemic outcomes—compliance, societal stability, and fairness—rather than sterile formalist consistency.
Legal Realism: Judicial Discretion and Institutional Context
American Legal Realism (championed by Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr., Karl Llewellyn, and Jerome Frank) pierced the myth that legal adjudication is a mechanical, deductive exercise. Law is administered by fallible human agents possessing interpretive latitude.
From a pragmatic perspective, this reality necessitates:
- Acknowledging that rules do not apply themselves; judges select which doctrinal tools to apply and calibrate them based on context and systemic consequences.
- Recognizing that legal certainty requires not merely well-drafted statutes, but transparent interpretive methodologies and structural checks on arbitrary whim.
- Treating procedural safeguards—reasoned opinions, public trials, and appellate review—as intrinsic elements of the law rather than mere administrative externalities.
A Concise, Workable Formulation
Synthesizing these analytical perspectives yields an integrated working formulation:
Law is an organized system of authoritative rules and procedures, backed by legitimate institutional power, designed to regulate conduct, adjudicate disputes, and equitably allocate social entitlements and burdens—operationalized through institutions (legislatures, judiciaries, and administrative bodies) that interpret, enforce, and adapt those norms to evolving societal imperatives.